ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2025
A study for expert-informed active pulmonary nodule segmentation.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of pulmonary nodule based on computed tomography (CT) images is of great significance for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. However, the current popular segmentation algorithms usually do not involve expert knowledge from radiologists, thereby carrying the risk of failing to produce generalizable and trustworthy models. In this study, we develop an expert-informed active pulmonary nodule segmentation method that iteratively optimize a deep segmentation model using an active learning scheme. The uncertainties from both intermediate segmentation results and correction inputs from radiologists are combined effectively. Interactive graph interfaces are developed to enable online corrections, significantly facilitating the integration of expert knowledge from radiologists. Evaluation results on the Luna16 dataset demonstrate that the proposed approach significantly promotes the segmentation performance of pulmonary nodules. The proposed method can effectively incorporate expert knowledge of multiple radiologists into deep segmentation algorithms, which not only promote the segmentation performance, but also enhance the validity, reliability, and generalizability of computer-aided diagnosis methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.