Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625494›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Ticagrelor-Induced Dermatological Hypersensitivity Reaction.

Snehal Lunge, Shimoni R Doshi, Vidyadhar R Sardesai

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Snehal LungeDermatology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune, Pune, IND.
Shimoni R DoshiDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune, Pune, IND.
Vidyadhar R SardesaiDermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, Pune, Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticagrelor, a potent antiplatelet medication widely used in acute coronary syndromes, is known for its favourable efficacy and safety profile as compared to clopidogrel. However, skin-related adverse events associated with ticagrelor are rare and not extensively reported in the literature. Here we present a 64-year-old male with a history of coronary artery disease and recent ticagrelor initiation following percutaneous coronary intervention. The patient developed a diffuse erythematous rash involving the trunk and extremities, two days post-ticagrelor initiation, prompting a thorough evaluation for drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions. The rash resolved upon discontinuation of ticagrelor and initiation of clopidogrel therapy along with corticosteroids and antihistamines. This case highlights the importance of recognizing dermatology adverse events associated with ticagrelor.

Indexed as

: acute coronary syndromeantiplatelet agentsclopidogreldrug-induced rashticagrelor hypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID40625494
PMCPMC12230203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.