Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625486›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Does Medical School Prestige Impact Match Rates in Competitive Specialties? A Retrospective Analysis.

Nathan Cuttica, Alexander Keith, Stephen E Hedberg, Nicholas Sciarretti, Jessica Ralph, Peter S Hedberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathan CutticaCollege of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA.
Alexander KeithCollege of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA.
Stephen E HedbergCollege of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA.
Nicholas SciarrettiCollege of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA.
Jessica RalphDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Peter S HedbergDepartment of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matching into a competitive specialty has historically required extensive research, leadership, and extracurricular activities. Since the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam has changed to a pass-fail grading system, it has been questioned whether medical school ranking will become a significant factor in matching into competitive medical specialties. To our knowledge, this is among the first studies to examine competitive specialty match trends following the transition to pass/fail Step 1 scoring. High-tier and low-tier medical schools were determined using the U.S. News and World Report 2024 Medical School Rankings list, and the 20 highest- and 20 lowest-ranked US-based allopathic medical schools were selected. Medical school competitiveness was determined using the mean USMLE Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK) score, mean number of research abstracts, publications, and presentations, percent of applicants that matched into said specialty, and percent of matched students that were Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) honors society members. The most competitive specialties were determined to be dermatology, neurological surgery, plastic surgery, orthopedic surgery, and otolaryngology. Match rates into competitive specialties were compared at high- and low-tier medical schools. Secondary analysis eliminated schools that did not have an affiliated residency program, termed a "home program", to examine this as a potential confounder. High-tier medical schools demonstrated statistically greater match rates into dermatology (p=0.046), neurological surgery (p=0.008), otolaryngology (p=0.008), and competitive specialties overall (p=0.006) when compared to low-tier medical schools. A difference was not noted for plastic surgery (p=0.308) and orthopedic surgery (p=0.809) match rates. However, when accounting for whether schools had affiliated residency programs, these differences were no longer statistically significant, highlighting the potential importance of home programs over school prestige alone. Higher-tier medical schools placed more students into competitive specialties, specifically dermatology, neurosurgery, and otolaryngology, when compared to lower-tier medical schools. Thus, attending a highly ranked allopathic medical school may serve as a significant benefit when applying to some competitive specialties. However, after eliminating high- and low-tier medical schools without an affiliated residency program, no statistical significance was observed for dermatology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology, or overall. Thus, medical school ranking may be less important than attending a school with a home program when applying for one of the five competitive specialties examined.

Indexed as

competitive specialtiesmedical schoolnational residency match program (nrmp) matchresidency matchspecialty match rates

Identifiers

PMID40625486
PMCPMC12233863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.