Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625438›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Development and validation of the participatory approach questionnaire (

Julien Lejeune, Anaïs Galy, Evelyne Fouquereau, Christine Jeoffrion, Julia Aubouin-Bonnaventure, Hélène Coillot, Jimmy Bordarie, Romuald Seizeur, Philippe Colombat

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julien LejeuneQualiPsy UR 1901, Psychology Department, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Anaïs GalyQualiPsy UR 1901, Psychology Department, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Evelyne FouquereauQualiPsy UR 1901, Psychology Department, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Christine JeoffrionQualiPsy UR 1901, Psychology Department, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Julia Aubouin-BonnaventureQualiPsy UR 1901, Psychology Department, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Hélène CoillotEE 1901 Quality of Life and Psychological Health, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Jimmy BordarieQualiPsy UR 1901, Psychology Department, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Romuald SeizeurService de Neurochirurgie, CHU Brest, Brest, France.
Philippe ColombatQualiPsy UR 1901, Psychology Department, University of Tours, Tours, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Participative Approach (PA) has demonstrated the potential to enhance both the quality of work life and the quality of care within French cancer teams. Whilst a number of studies have demonstrated that the participatory approach exerts a positive impact on all stakeholders within the care context, none of them have thus far used a measurement of the PA that has been scientifically validated. Therefore, the aim of this research was to develop and validate the PARTAQUE (Participatory Approach Questionnaire) and to assess its psychometric properties. This objective was pursued by conducting three independent studies in French healthcare organizations. The assessment of the factorial structure of the scale confirmed a good fit with a second-order factor model, and the test of convergent and predictive validity showed consistent relationships with theorized outcomes (e.g., attitudinal and behavioral work outcomes, occupational health indicators). The implications for research and practice are then discussed.

Indexed as

cancer teamsParticipative Approach (PA)quality of carequality of work lifescale validation

Identifiers

PMID40625438
PMCPMC12230024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.