ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The impact of different adverse childhood experiences on the dimensions of emotional dysregulation in adults with major depression.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measures matter: assessing childhood maltreatment and emotion dysregulation in a transdiagnostic sample.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- Article
- Childhood trauma and impulsivity in children with first-episode depression: mediation by left frontopolar thickness.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Breastfeeding in the Context of Trauma and Previous Psychological Experiences: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Patient complexity profiles in depression: a machine learning approach to personalized mental health.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The relationship between childhood trauma and psychological security: the mediating role of self-disclosure and perceived social support in Iranian medical students.BMC psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adverse childhood experiences adversely affect the development of emotional regulation, yet their differential impact on discrete dysregulation dimensions in major depressive disorder remains underexamined. This study examines the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and emotional dysregulation, as well as its five dimensions. Methods: A total of 120 out-patients meeting the BDI-II cutoff for MDD completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-SF (CTQ-SF) and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). We first tested sex differences on DERS subscales (none emerged), then ran a multivariate multiple regression using Pillai's trace to assess the joint effects of the five CTQ-SF dimensions on the five DERS dimensions. Six follow-up linear regressions predicted each DERS subscale and the total DERS score from the CTQ-SF dimensions. Results: Physical abuse was the only CTQ dimension with a significant multivariate effect. In univariate models, emotional abuse predicted higher overall dysregulation and increased emotional dyscontrol, everyday interference, and emotional inattention, whereas greater physical abuse was associated with reduced everyday interference. Discussion: Emotional abuse appears to be the principal driver of both global and facet-specific emotion-regulation difficulties in adults with MDD, suggesting that interventions emphasizing impulse control, emotion awareness, and reduction of functional interference may be particularly beneficial for this subgroup. Limitations: The cross-sectional, selfreport design precludes causal inferences and may be subject to recall bias; future work should employ longitudinal, multimethod approaches to elucidate mechanisms and resilience factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.