ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Accurately tracking visual moving stimuli with gaze requires a higher fidelity motion representation than perceptual discrimination.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human visual system evolved to process and interpret continuous visual input. However, visual signals in modern societies increasingly emanate from digital displays, which emulate continuous motion by presenting a series of discrete frames at some fixed temporal frequency. How does noncontinuous, sampled motion influence visual perception and action? We asked participants to complete a combined oculomotor and speed-discrimination task, where they tracked the motion of a stimulus via smooth pursuit eye movements and compared the velocity of the pursuit stimulus with a reference velocity. Motion quality was manipulated by presenting discrete frames at different temporal frequencies (120, 60, 30, and 15 Hz), covering a range of values corresponding to different motion qualia, from quasi-continuous (120 Hz) to highly discontinuous (15 Hz). We found that participants could reliably discriminate velocities, even at low refresh rates. However, measures of pursuit quality declined with decreasing refresh rate and increasing target velocity: a perception-action dissociation. The decline in pursuit accuracy can be explained by a model estimating a proxy for motion quality from the spatiotemporal energy profile of the stimuli. Using this estimate, our model predicts pursuit accuracy for arbitrary combinations of target velocity and refresh rate. Our results highlight the dissociation between perception and action in digital displays with sampled motion; while we may be able to accurately discriminate motion at reduced frame rates, acting on moving stimuli requires a higher fidelity motion representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.