ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2025
Real-World Efficacy and Safety of S-1 Monotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Management: Insights From a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: S-1, an oral chemotherapy combining tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil, has shown efficacy comparable with docetaxel for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in clinical trials. However, its real-world effectiveness and safety remain underexplored. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 2 tertiary referral centers: National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH) from July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2023 (last follow-up in October 31, 2023) and Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH) from February 1, 2020 to January 31, 2023 (last follow-up in August 31, 2023). The study included 132 NSCLC patients receiving S-1 monotherapy (77 from CGMH and 55 from NCKUH). After excluding 31 patients with less than 2 weeks of treatment, 101 patients were analyzed. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) was 7.9%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 44%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.6 and 6.0 months, respectively. First-line or second-line S-1 therapy significantly improved DCR (61.1% vs 33.8%, Conclusions: S-1 monotherapy demonstrated comparable effectiveness and manageable toxicity in real-world settings, with significantly better outcomes when used as first-line or second-line treatment in NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.