Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625391›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Parental presence improves pediatric MRI success without sedation: a prospective randomized study.

Hideyuki Iwayama, Noriko Hayata, Mizuki Takagi, Ryohei Fukatsu, Kohei Kawahara, Hiroaki Somiya, Jun Sada, Shingo Numoto, Kiyoshi Yamakawa, Ryosuke Miyamoto and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hideyuki IwayamaDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Noriko HayataDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Mizuki TakagiDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Ryohei FukatsuDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Kohei KawaharaDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Hiroaki SomiyaDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Jun SadaDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Shingo NumotoDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Kiyoshi YamakawaDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Ryosuke MiyamotoDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Hiromitsu MoriDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Taichiro MutoDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Hirokazu KurahashiDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Mio AndoDepartment of Radiology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Makoto EndoDepartment of Radiology, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Wataru OhashiDivision of Biostatistics, Clinical Research Center, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Sachiko KitagawaDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Yoshinori ItoDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Akihisa OkumuraDepartment of Pediatrics, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) requires children to remain still for extended periods, often necessitating sedation, which carries risks and raises costs. Non-pharmacologic strategies such as video goggles, evening scheduling, mock MRI training, and child life specialist-led preparation have been explored. The effectiveness of parental presence, especially in younger children, remains underexamined. Methods: This prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial included children aged 3-10 years referred for short stature evaluation. All were admitted for GH testing and underwent pituitary MRI if peak GH was ≤6.0 ng/ml. Participants were stratified by age (3-6 and 7-10 years) and randomized to parent present or absent groups using block randomization. MRI success was assessed in three steps: Step 1, completion of all sequences; Step 2, image quality (no, mild, or severe artifacts) evaluated blindly by two pediatricians; Step 3, final success defined as completion with no or mild artifacts. Exploratory variables included sibling number and crying during routine vaccinations. Results: Eighty children were enrolled, with 40 assigned to each group. Step 1: Completion rates were 30/40 (75.0%) in the parent present group and 22/40 (55.0%) in the parent absent group ( Discussion: Parental presence significantly improved non-sedated MRI success in children aged 3-6 years. Compared to other interventions, it is simple, safe, low-cost, and requires no specialized resources, supporting its use as a first-line strategy in younger children.

Indexed as

image quality assessmentnon-sedated MRIparental presencepediatric imagingrandomized controlled studysuccess rate

Identifiers

PMID40625391
PMCPMC12230062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.