Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625363›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2025

A randomised trial to assess the efficacy of add on therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel to the standard medical therapy alone in patients with tubercular meningitis: ACT TBM.

Rohit Bhatia, Ritu Shree, Manish Modi, Abhishek Anand, Ajay Garg, Partha Haldar, Madakasira Vasantha Padma Srivastava, Neeraj Singla, Manoj Goyal, Supriya Supriya and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Rohit BhatiaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ritu ShreeDepartment of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Manish ModiDepartment of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Abhishek AnandDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ajay GargDepartment of Neuroimaging and Interventional Neuroradiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Partha HaldarCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Madakasira Vasantha Padma SrivastavaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Neeraj SinglaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Manoj GoyalDepartment of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Supriya SupriyaDepartment of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Kusum SharmaDepartment of Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Naveet WigDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mamta Bhushan SinghDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Saman FatimaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Imnameren LongkumerDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Tanupriya BindalDepartment of Pathology, Dr B.R. Ambedkar State Institute of Medical Sciences, Mohali, India.
Achal SrivastavaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Venugopalan Y VishnuDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ashutosh BiswasDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sanjeev SinhaDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Naval K VikramDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sreenivas VishnubhatlaDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Navneet SharmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Paramjeet SinghDepartment of Radiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Bikash MedhiDepartment of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Chirag AhujaDepartment of Radiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Benefit of antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention or treatment among patients of Tubercular meningitis (TBM) is uncertain. We hypothesised that add-on therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel to standard treatment will be safe and effective in reducing clinical stroke and/or cerebral infarction in patients with TBM. Methods: This was a randomised, open-label, superiority trial with blinded outcome assessment. Patients with suspected TBM were randomised to receive either add-on oral aspirin 75 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg along with ATT (anti-tubercular treatment) or only ATT. Clinical follow up, MRI brain, and MR Angiogram were performed at baseline, one and three months from randomisation. Primary outcome was reduction in occurrence of clinical stroke and/or imaging-based cerebral infarction at one and three months. Safety outcome was the occurrence of major or minor bleeding. Key secondary outcomes included mortality at one and three months and modified Rankin scale (mRS) at three months. Findings: A total of 237 patients with TBM were randomised (77 in the aspirin group, 77 in the clopidogrel group, and 83 in the standard treatment group). At one month, clinical stroke outcome was available for 66 (85.7%), 72 (93.5%) and 69 (83.1%) patients and MRI brain was available for 61 (79.2%), 65 (84.4%) and 62 (74.7%) patients, respectively. Clinical stroke was observed in one (1.5%) in aspirin group, none (0.0%) in clopidogrel group, and three (4.3%) patients in standard group (across group comparison p = 0.2); imaging-based cerebral infarction was observed in six (9.8%), eight (12.3%), and seven (11.3%) patients, respectively (across group comparison p = 0.9). At three months, clinical stroke outcome in aspirin, clopidogrel and standard groups was available for 60 (77.9%), 63 (81.8%) and 59 (71.1%) patients and MRI brain was available for 57 (74.0%), 60 (77.9%) and 55 (66.3%) patients, respectively. Clinical stroke was observed in two (3.3%), one (1.6%), and two (3.4%) patients (across group comparison p = 0.8) and imaging-based infarction was observed in two (3.5%), three (5.0%), and two (3.6%) patients, respectively (across group comparison p = 0.9). Using intention-to-treat approach following a complete cases analysis method, primary outcome at one month was observed in six (9.1%) in aspirin group, eight (11.1%) in clopidogrel group, and ten (14.3%) in standard group (across group comparison p = 0.6, aspiring vs. standard: adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.56 [95% CI 0.21-1.47], clopidogrel vs. standard: aRR 0.72 [95% CI 0.30-1.67]) and four (6.7%), four (6.1%), and three (5.1%) respectively at three months (across group comparison p = 0.9, aspirin vs. standard: aRR 0.98 [95% CI 0.20-4.82], clopidogrel vs. standard: aRR 0.43 [95% CI 0.06-2.87]). Major bleeding was observed in two patients: one each in clopidogrel (1.3%) and standard group (1.3%). Minor bleeding was observed in five patients: four (5.3%) in clopidogrel group, and one (1.2%) in the standard group. Eleven (15.1%), 8 (10.7%), and 12 (15.4%) died at three months in aspirin, clopidogrel and standard groups respectively. There was no difference in bleeding, mortality, and mRS among the groups. Interpretation: Among patients with TBM, no difference was observed by an add-on therapy of antiplatelets to the standard care compared to standard care alone on clinical stroke, imaging-based cerebral infarction, or mortality. Funding: Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.

Indexed as

AntiplateletsAspirinCerebral infarctionClopidogrelStrokeTBMTubercular meningitisTuberculous meningitis

Identifiers

PMID40625363
PMCPMC12230414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.