ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports
Healthcare related costs associated with donepezil use in patients with very mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: A retrospective observational study.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The cost-effectiveness of Donepezil in mild to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been widely studied, but research on very mild dementia (VMD) remains limited. Objective: This retrospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of Donepezil in patients with VMD in two hospitals in southern Taiwan between 2011 and 2019. Methods: We recruited 909 VMD patients with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5 and used propensity score matching to create two groups: 352 receiving Donepezil and 352 not. Demographic data, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and healthcare costs were analyzed over 1-year and 3-year periods. Results: At baseline, Donepezil treatment was associated with lower inpatient, outpatient, and overall healthcare costs. After 1 year, outpatient drug costs increased, while inpatient drug costs decreased, leading to higher overall healthcare drug costs. Over 3 years, outpatient drug continued to rise, while inpatient drug costs remained stable, leading to higher overall healthcare drug costs. Donepezil users had significantly more outpatient visits, but inpatient admissions were unaffected. Patients receiving Donepezil were older and had lower MMSE; male gender, Parkinsonism, chronic lung disease, and liver disease were less common in this group. Conclusions: Although Donepezil users initially had lower healthcare costs, overall healthcare drug costs increased in the Donepezil group at both the 1-year and 3-year follow-ups, while inpatient drug costs were only reduced in the short term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.