ArticleAsian journal of andrology2026
Assessing post-marketing safety of PDE5Is in erectile dysfunction: real-world evidence from the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Asian journal of andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition affecting men worldwide. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), including sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, and avanafil, for treating ED. However, real-world studies on adverse events (AEs) linked to PDE5Is are limited. This study comprehensively assessed the safety of PDE5Is based on reports from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database from January 2004 to June 2024. The disproportionality analysis was used to evaluate the safety profiles of PDE5Is. Based on demographic stratification, correlational analysis and signal differences examination in subgroups were performed in different PDE5Is. Among the 53 517 AEs reports collected from the FAERS database, we identified 135, 73, 72, and 7 preferred terms associated with sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil, and avanafil, respectively. The study detected AEs listed on the FDA-approved label of each PDE5I. However, some AEs not listed on the labels were also identified. Some AEs listed by the FDA for PDE5Is were insignificant signals in our analysis. Significant differences were found among PDE5Is across age, weight, and onset time categories. We detected AEs related to the nervous, cardiovascular, and ocular systems that were not listed on the labels of the four PDE5Is, warranting further research on the underlying mechanisms. Additionally, significant differences in PDE5I-associated AEs were observed across age, weight, and onset time, highlighting the need for tailored patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.