Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625250›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2025

Validation of Lyon 2.0 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Consensus: Limited Clinical Utility of Mean Nocturnal Basal Impedance in Koreans.

Jae Hyuk Lee, Boram Cha, Kee Wook Jung, Soo In Choi, Ga Hee Kim, Myeongsook Seo, Ju Yup Lee, Seung Young Kim, Jong Wook Kim, Kee Don Choi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Modern Diagnostic Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Focus on Lyon Consensus 2.0].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jae Hyuk LeeAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Boram ChaInha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Kee Wook JungAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Soo In ChoiInje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Ga Hee KimSeverance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Myeongsook SeoGangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangnueung, Gangwon State, Korea.
Ju Yup LeeKeimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Seung Young KimKorea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Jong Wook KimInje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Kee Don ChoiAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Kyong NaAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Yong AhnAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
JeongHoon LeeAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Do Hoon KimAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ho June SongAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gin Hyug LeeAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hwoon-Yong JungAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
GERD Research Group under the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility

Funding

NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: The Lyon Consensus 2.0 (Lyon 2.0) revised gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) definitions, incorporating Los Angeles (LA) grade B as diagnostic and mean nocturnal basal impedance (MNBI) as supplementary evidence. Asian populations show differing impedancepH thresholds, with lower acid exposure time (AET) and higher MNBI values. The clinical validity of MNBI in Asian GERD patients remains uncertain. This study evaluated Lyon 2.0's applicability to Korean patients. Methods: From January 2021 to August 2023, GERD-suspected patients underwent endoscopy, manometry, and pH testing. MNBI was measured 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. Patients with major motor disorders, organic diseases, or prior foregut surgery were excluded. GERD was defined by AET ≥ 4% or LA grades B-D; non-GERD by AET < 4%, LA grade A or normal Z line with < 40 reflux episodes/day. The optimal MNBI threshold was determined via receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Among 427 patients (mean age 57.7 ± 13.8 years, 37.2% male), 59 (13.8%) had GERD (10 endoscopically confirmed, 54 by AET ≥ 4%). Non-GERD accounted for 63.5% (n = 271), with 22.7% (n = 97) in the borderline group. MNBI correlated negatively with AET ( Conclusion: MNBI significantly correlated with AET and LA grades, highlighting its diagnostic value in Korean GERD patients. However, regional variations suggest higher MNBI thresholds than Lyon 2.0 recommendations, warranting further studies to refine criteria for Asian populations.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal refluxLyon Consensus 2.0Mean nocturnal basal impedance

Identifiers

PMID40625250
PMCPMC12241920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.