Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625248›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2025

Association Between Psychological Burden and Unexplained High Upper Esophageal Sphincter Basal Pressure.

Dianxuan Jiang, Qianjun Zhuang, Songfeng Chen, Xingyu Jia, Jing Chen, Niandi Tan, Mengyu Zhang, Yinglian Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dianxuan JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qianjun ZhuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Songfeng ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xingyu JiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Niandi TanDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Mengyu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yinglian XiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Proximal esophageal dysmotility and high psychological burden are common in individuals with esophageal or laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms. However, the clinical significance of abnormal proximal motility remains unclear. Given that proximal esophagus consists of skeletal muscle, proximal esophageal motility may be influenced by psychological burden. This study aims to explore the relationship between psychological burden and proximal esophageal motility. Methods: Patients with esophageal or laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms were retrospectively included. Esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS) was used to evaluate the psychological burden in patients. Demographics, endoscopic findings, proximal and distal esophageal manometric parameters, and reflux burden were compared between patients with and without esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between psychological burden and proximal esophageal motility. Results: A total of 341 subjects were enrolled. A greater proportion of patients with high EHAS had elevated upper esophageal sphincter (UES) basal pressure than those with normal EHAS (21.5% vs 11.8%, Conclusions: Elevated UES basal pressure is more frequently seen in symptomatic patients with high esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety. When encountering patients with unexplained high UES basal pressure, psychological burden may play a potential role in these cases.

Indexed as

AnxietyEsophageal motility disordersEsophageal sphincterLaryngopharyngeal refluxupper

Identifiers

PMID40625248
PMCPMC12241926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.