Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625124›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2025

Treatment of biochemical recurrence after primary therapy with curative intent.

Navid Roessler, Marcin Miszczyk, Nadja Strewinsky, Paweł Rajwa, Shahrokh F Shariat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Navid RoesslerDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marcin MiszczykDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nadja StrewinskyDepartment of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology, University Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Paweł RajwaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe aimed to summarize the recent advancements in management of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary curative therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), and the role of advanced imaging technologies in guiding and improving treatment decisions. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have reshaped the approach to managing BCR after primary treatment for PCa. A key shift is the preference for early salvage radiotherapy (sRT), which has proven to offer comparable or even superior outcomes to immediate adjuvant therapy when closely monitored for progression. PSA kinetics (PSA doubling time) continue to guide treatment decisions, together with the time to PSA rise, Gleason Grade of the original tumor, and PSMA-PET imaging at the time of recurrence. While PSMA-PET significantly enhances the precision of recurrence detection, its sensitivity for smaller pelvic lymph node metastases remains limited, underscoring the need for careful consideration of all factors together to develop a risk-based consulting for all individualized treatment plan integrating patient wishes and health. SUMMARY: Recent studies underscore the efficacy of early sRT in managing BCR, with PSA kinetics and ISUP score as a crucial factor in guiding treatment decisions. Furthermore, the integration of PSMA-PET imaging has improved the precision of recurrence detection, facilitating more tailored and effective treatment strategies for patients with BCR. We are finally entering the age of personalized, risk-based, patient-centred case delivery, where treatment of the primary tumor with curative intent is offered to patients with BCR.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsSalvage TherapyClinical Decision-MakingHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingPositron-Emission TomographyProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeProstate-Specific Antigenbiochemical recurrenceprostate cancerPSMA-PETsalvage therapy

Identifiers

PMID40625124
PMCPMC12337907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.