ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2025
IQ, an Uninvited Guest in the Field of Learning?: Correlation Study of Comprehensive Learning Test.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prefrontal activation and connectivity during verbal fluency in autism Spectrum disorder: an fNIRS study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThough substantial studies have revealed various factors contributing to learning reading and mathematics independent of intelligence, the relationship between learning and intelligence is multifaceted. The current study aimed to explore the correlation between intelligence and learning in reading and math, considering both general intelligence (Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient [FSIQ]) and specific domains of the Wechsler intelligence test to identify which aspects contribute to different learning areas.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on outpatients between the ages of 6 and 17 (N = 100), who were assessed using the Wechsler intelligence test and the Comprehensive Learning Test for reading and mathematics (CLT-R: Reading, CLT-M: Mathematic). A Pearson correlation analysis examined the relationships between FSIQ, indices (verbal comprehensive index [VCI], perceptual reasoning index [PRI], working memory index [WMI], processing speed index [PSI]), and CLT subtests in the full sample of 100 participants and the subset with an FSIQ of 70 or higher.
resultsThe correlation analysis revealed that most CLT-R and CLT-M subtests had statistically significant positive correlations with FSIQ in both the full sample and the subset. For CLT-M and indices, VCI and PRI showed significant correlations with several CLT-M subtests in the full sample, but most were no longer significant in the subset with an FSIQ of 70 or higher. WMI and PSI maintained correlations with speed, but not accuracy, in computation, comparison, and enumeration for the subset. As for CLT-R, several CLT-R subtests correlated positively with both the WMI and VCI indices in both groups.
conclusionThe current study showed that most subtests in both reading and math exhibited significant positive correlations with general intelligence (FSIQ), whereas specific indices of intelligence (VCI, PRI, WMI, PSI) varied in their correlation with different subtests. These findings challenge the prevailing notion of excluding intelligence from studies of learning and underscore the necessity for future research to adopt more index- and element-specific approaches when investigating the relationship between learning and intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.