Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625018›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2025

Intra-, Epidural And Intracranial Pressure Changes During Interlaminar Endoscopy, With and Without Dural Tear.

Mazda Farshad, Jana Felicitas Schader, Alexandra Stauffer, Carl Moritz Zipser, Najmeh Kheram, José Miguel Spirig, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Jonas Widmer, Vincent Hagel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Validation of the VIEW score: a novel intraoperative grading scale for visualization in endoscopic spine surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Epidemiology of spinal cord hypertension syndrome in water-mediated uniportal full endoscopic thoracolumbar surgery: a single-center experience.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mazda FarshadUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jana Felicitas SchaderUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexandra StaufferUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carl Moritz ZipserSpinal Cord Injury Center and Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Najmeh KheramSpinal Cord Injury Center and Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
José Miguel SpirigUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marie-Rosa FasserSpine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas WidmerSpine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Vincent HagelUniversity Spine Center Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndoscopic spine surgery implies possibly severe complications of the central nervous system, from headache to seizures and autonomic dysreflexia. These adverse events might be due to increased intracranial pressure (ICP), presumably induced by increased spinal intra-/epidural pressure caused by fluid irrigation. This study was designed to perform interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) at different irrigation fluid settings while monitoring its effect on intra-/epidural and ICPs, with and without dural tears.

methodsSpinal intradural pressures were measured by introducing catheters through a sacral approach to human cadavers' lumbar, thoracic, and cervical levels. Additionally, an epidural probe was placed at L3-4. ICP was measured by an intraventricular probe. IELD was performed at L3-4, and the effect of varying irrigation pressures by different endoscopic pump systems and gravity-based irrigation on intra-/epidural and ICP pressures was measured before and after durotomy at L3-4.

resultsIntradural pressure at L3-4 correlated linearly with increasing irrigation pressure, irrespective of the used pump system (median pressure increase at 100-mmHg irrigation pressure: system I: 7 mmHg, r=0.94, p=0.002; system II: 7 mmHg, r=0.89, p=0.017) or gravity (8 mmHg, r=0.93, p=0.242). This effect was also seen intradurally at the thoracic/cervical spine, epidural, and intracranial level, and was even more pronounced with the maneuver of outflow-occlusion and a dural tear present.

conclusionWhile performing IELD, pump pressures correlated linearly to intra-/epidural pressures and ICPs. Pressures did not rise to concerningly high levels without outflow-occlusion, even with increased pump pressures. In the presence of a dural tear, higher pump pressures exacerbated by occlusion may lead to deleterious intradural and ICP elevations.

Indexed as

Endoscopic spine surgeryIntradural pressureIrrigation pressureMinimally invasive spine surgeryPump pressureSpine endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40625018
PMCPMC12242749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.