ArticleNeurospine2025
Evaluating the Technical Specifications and Clinical Performance of Different Percutaneous Epidural Neuroplasty Catheters.
Article in Neurospine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate and compare the structural and functional characteristics of commercially available percutaneous epidural neuroplasty (PEN) catheters. Correlations among catheter properties were also examined to identify potential implications for clinical practice.
methodsNine PEN catheter products from different manufacturers were analyzed. Various physical properties were assessed, including catheter diameter, length, lever rotation angle, bending degree, and advancing force. Bending degree was measured at maximal and half-maximal lever rotation angles, with and without the guidewire inserted. Advancing force was determined by measuring pressure generated at the catheter tip upon contact with the electronic scale plate. Wilcoxon signed-rank and Spearman correlation tests were used for statistical analysis.
resultsCatheters exhibited considerable variations in structural and functional properties. The average catheter diameter and length were 2.0±0.6 mm and 287.8±30.3 mm, respectively; the mean lever rotation angle was 57°±21°. When the steering lever was rotated to its maximum allowable angle, proximal bend angle significantly increased in the wire-off state relative to the wire-on state, suggesting a trade-off between flexibility and structural support. Advancing force significantly varied across products; a positive correlation was observed between catheter diameter and advancing force.
conclusionThis study identified substantial variations in catheter characteristics across different products. Increased catheter flexibility after guidewire removal may lead to positional instability, requiring careful consideration during PEN procedures. Larger catheter diameters were correlated with increased advancing force, which could influence ease of insertion and patient comfort. These findings emphasize the need for standardized PEN catheter specifications to optimize safety and efficacy in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.