ArticleNeurospine2025
Advances in Therapeutic Applications of CRISPR Genome Editing for Spinal Pain Management.
Article in Neurospine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting Spinal Dorsal Horn Sensitisation in Chronic Pain: Mechanisms and Translational Strategies.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Review
- CRISPRi-Mediated Epigenetic Suppression of TERT Reduces Cell Growth in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells.Cells · 2026Article
- Review
- Targeting NaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- AI-driven CRISPR strategies in breast cancer: Organoid modeling, adaptive editing, and precision delivery.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Designing Neural Dynamics: From Digital Twin Modeling to Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advanced biomaterials and virtual reality for interventions in rare episodic cluster headache mimicking SUNCT syndrome: emerging directions in precision pain management.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuropathic pain remains a significant clinical challenge due to the limited efficacy and sustainability of existing pharmacological treatments, underscoring the urgent need for mechanism-based therapeutic strategies. In recent years, gene-targeted interventions have emerged as promising modalities capable of modulating key molecular pathways implicated in chronic pain. Approaches such as antisense oligonucleotides and RNA interference have demonstrated encouraging preclinical results by selectively downregulating pain-associated genes. Based on these developments, genome-editing technologies-particularly the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system-have enabled more precise and long-lasting modifications at both the DNA and RNA levels. This review highlights how CRISPR-based approaches in addressing the critical issues of specificity and long-term efficacy in pain gene therapy and exploring the functional roles of key gene targets and regulatory elements. Although challenges such as off-target activity and immunogenic responses remain, growing preclinical evidence supports the feasibility of CRISPR-based approaches in neuropathic pain. Collectively, these developments position CRISPR as a transformative tool to innovate the standard care for persistent pain syndromes and contribute to broader biomedical and pharmaceutical developments through continued refinement of targeting strategies and safety profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.