Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624969›Full record

ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Electrochemotherapy for Anorectal Tumors: A Narrative Literature Review.

Martina Ferioli, Alessandra Arcelli, Savino Cilla, Arina A Zamfir, Giorgio Tolento, Dajana Cuicchi, Milly Buwenge, Erika Galietta, Bruno Fionda, Luca Tagliaferri and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Martina FerioliRadiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Alessandra ArcelliRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Savino CillaMedical Physics Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Arina A ZamfirRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-9966-6342
Giorgio TolentoRadiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Dajana CuicchiSurgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Milly BuwengeRadiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
Erika GaliettaRadiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5202-3472
Bruno FiondaUOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3368-1810
Luca TagliaferriUOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Matteo RottoliSurgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Gilberto PoggioliSurgery of the Alimentary Tract, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessio G MorgantiRadiation Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review explores the potential role of electrochemotherapy (ECT) in treating anorectal tumors, focusing on its effectiveness, feasibility, and associated toxicities. ECT, which combines chemotherapy with the application of an electric field to enhance drug uptake by tumor cells, has shown promise as a local treatment, particularly in cases where conventional therapies such as radiotherapy have been exhausted or are unsuitable. The review, conducted according to SANRA guidelines, included 18 studies, on ECT in anorectal tumors, ranging from preclinical trials in dogs to case reports and clinical studies in humans. The findings indicate that ECT can achieve high tumor overall response rates (70-100%) with minimal side effects, offering benefits such as tumor reduction and preserved organ function. These results highlight the potential of ECT to provide not only tumor reduction but also the preservation of vital organ function with a relatively low toxicity profile. However, further comparative research is necessary to substantiate its role as a standard therapeutic option. Moreover, the evidence is limited by significant heterogeneity across studies, small sample sizes, and a lack of comparative research with other local treatments like radiotherapy and cryosurgery. Consequently, while ECT appears to be a promising option, particularly for palliative care or in a neoadjuvant setting, it cannot yet be recommended as a standard treatment. Future research should focus on larger, more robust studies with standardized outcomes and explore the potential synergy between ECT and other therapies to establish its place in the treatment of anorectal tumors.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsElectrochemotherapyRectal NeoplasmsAnimalsCombined Modality TherapyHumansTreatment Outcomeanal canceranorectal tumorscase reportsclinical trialscolorectal cancercomparative studieselectrochemotherapylocal treatmentmultidisciplinary approachneoadjuvant therapyoncological outcomespalliative carerectal cancertoxicitytumor control

Identifiers

PMID40624969
PMCPMC12246664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.