ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025
Embolization of the middle meningeal artery for chronic subdural hematoma: The OTEMACS multicenter, randomized, clinical trial protocol.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Middle meningeal artery embolization in chronic subdural hematoma: a paradigm shift?European radiology · 2026Review
- Neurointerventional Advances in 2025.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Two-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundThe role of middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization as an adjunct to standard treatment in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is debated. Further randomized trials are needed to establish MMA embolization as an essential therapeutic option for CSDH. The OTEMACS study aims to assess the adjunctive benefit of MMA embolization in patients undergoing either conservative or surgical treatment for CSDH.MethodsOTEMACS is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial with an open-label and blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE) design. Patients with symptomatic CSDH treated either with conservative or surgical treatment are randomized 1:1 to receive MMA embolization within 72 h (experimental arm) or standard of care alone (control arm). The primary efficacy outcome is a composite of clinical and radiological events, including surgical rescue or revision surgery within 90 ± 14 days postrandomization or radiological remaining of the CSDH thickness >10 mm at 90 ± 14 days postrandomization. The primary safety outcome included all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the modified Rankin scale, Barthel index, EuroQol-5, and Mini Mental State Examination. The number of patients to be included is 440.ResultsThe trial debuted in October 2021 in six centers, in France. A preplanned interim analysis was performed after the enrollment and completion of the follow-up of 220 patients, and the Data Safety Monitoring Board decided to stop the trial for efficacy. The final results will be made available upon completion of the enrollment.ConclusionsOTEMACS will provide additional evidence for the clinical and radiological efficacy and safety of MMA embolization in patients with CSDH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.