ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025
Timely integration of palliative care into standard oncology care: An interview study with clinicians and patients with incurable cancer.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTimely integration of palliative care (PC) into standard oncology hospital care offers significant benefits to patients with incurable cancer and their families. International recognition of the importance of timely PC has shifted the focus from integration to determining the optimal timing for introducing PC. The specific care responsibilities of oncology clinicians acting as generalists in PC and the optimal timing for involving PC specialists remain uncertain.
objectivesThis study aimed to (1) explore how the concept of "timely PC" is understood by oncology clinicians and patients with incurable cancer and (2) investigate how PC is provided in a timely manner in daily clinical practice.
methodsAn interview study was conducted with 18 oncology clinicians (7 physicians, 1 physician assistant, and 10 nurses/nurse practitioners) and 12 patients with incurable cancer. The interviews were conducted between October 2022 and June 2023 and a thematic analysis of the interviews was performed.
resultsThree main themes emerged regarding "timely PC": (1) timely PC is individual and situational, (2) identification of the right time is an ongoing challenge, and (3) proactive care is essential. Regarding the provision of timely PC, 3 themes were identified: (1) having a strong collaboration among various clinicians, (2) having the courage to start a clear and sincere conversation, and (3) being sensitive and personal. SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsBeing timely is not a fixed point in time, but depends on the individual patient and their situation. Clinicians should be proactive and gradual in bringing up PC-related topics and be careful to use the right words. Tools such as the surprise question can support in timely integrating PC but being timely PC highly depends on a patient's individual context. Therefore, clinicians should be aware that timely PC is a constant search for the most fitting moment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.