ArticleTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Article in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative mechanical ventilation management in COPD: A state of the art review.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Review
- Functional assessment and clinical staging of patients undergoing lung resection.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary segmentectomy is increasingly recognized as a viable alternative to lobectomy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering comparable oncological outcomes with potentially reduced morbidity. Identifying reliable predictors for postoperative complications and prolonged air leak (PAL) is crucial for optimizing patient selection. While multifactorial scoring systems exist, their complexity limits clinical utility and the predictive value of single factors, such as forced expiratory volume in 1s (
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the ability of preoperative
designA retrospective, single-center study compared outcomes between patients undergoing segmentectomy (
methodsPatient characteristics, complication rates, and PAL incidence were analyzed. Logistic regression and ROC curve analyses assessed the predictive accuracy of
resultsBaseline characteristics, including
conclusionPreoperative
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.