Trial reportClinical & experimental ophthalmology2025
Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Surgical Stability and Safety During a 2-Year Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03406416 (Evaluation of a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: A 44 Channel Fully Implantable Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in neuroprostheses: interfaces, materials, and applications.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- Bionic vision technologies: progress and perspectives on retinal prostheses and optogenetics for the treatment of advanced retinal degeneration.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- Development and Evaluation of Multi-Module Retinal Devices for Artificial Vision Applications.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Face and Available Chair Detection and Localization With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Observational
- Review of brain-computer interface technology in ophthalmology: Current status, challenges and future directions.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the safety and stability profile of the suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (ScRP) in participants with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) for 2 years from implantation.
methodsFour participants, with advanced RP and bare-light perception vision were enrolled in a prospective, single arm unmasked interventional clinical trial and unilaterally implanted with a 44-channel ScRP (NCT03406416). Electrical stimulation commenced in the psychophysics laboratory prior to use in local environments. Outcome measures included serious adverse events, adverse events, implant stability and implant functionality to assess the safety and stability profile over 2.0-2.7 years.
resultsSurgical procedures took 204-260 min and were uncomplicated. Postoperative recovery was uneventful. Imaging confirmed the device position under the macula and the absence of retinal trauma. There were no serious adverse events and the adverse events that occurred were mild. All electrodes were functional at surgery completion, and only 3% electrodes lost functionality by study end. There was minor array movement (translational and rotational) within the first 10-15 weeks only. The electrode to retina distance increased as expected with fibrous capsule development, but plateaued in three of four participants within 12 months. Retinal and choroidal thicknesses were consistent with the underlying retinal dystrophic disease.
conclusionsThe ScRP can be safely implanted in the suprachoroidal space and has minimal long-term impacts on the eye, with no SAEs and only slight array movement seen over 2.0-2.7 years. Hence, the findings indicate approach feasibility and further multicentre studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.