Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624810›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2025

Outcomes of an Intervention Programme for People With Intellectual Disabilities and Behavioural Concerns Based on Emotional Development.

Allan Skelly, Jade Wigham, Mark Hudson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allan SkellyCumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.
Jade WighamCumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.
Mark HudsonMental Health and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7435-0084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper examines clinical outcomes of an approach to referrals for concerns about severe behavioural distress in people with intellectual disabilities (ID) that is based on the concepts of emotional development (EDev) and attachment. Due to research and clinical experiences suggesting that positive behaviour support (PBS) may have limited long-term impact, an alternative approach is proposed, which focuses on relational factors and emotional skills already held by carers. METHODOLOGY: We report the process and outcomes of a brief standardised assessment using the Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) which then informed an attachment-based workshop. Outcomes were measured by way of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales-Learning Disabilities (HoNOS-LD) administered at (a) assessment, (b) following 1-2 intervention workshops and (c) at 6-month follow-up.

resultsSignificantly fewer sessions and hours of clinical time were required for the EDev intervention than the prior PBS interventions. Results demonstrated significant improvements from assessment to post-intervention, which were maintained 6 months later. Almost half (48%) of the participants were referred while in unsettled accommodation arrangements.

conclusionsThis study provides initial evidence supporting an approach that shows promise as an alternative to existing models of care based upon applied behaviour analysis. Future well-controlled studies across multiple sites are needed, but if these findings are replicated, the priority for intervention may shift from reduction in behavioural risks to robust care relationships which meet the person's emotional needs.

Indexed as

EmotionsIntellectual DisabilityOutcome Assessment, Health CareProblem BehaviorAdolescentAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultattachmentemotional developmentintellectual disabilityintervention

Identifiers

PMID40624810
PMCPMC12576389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.