ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
The influence of closed sutures on cranial morphology in Apert and Crouzon syndromes: A quantitative analysis.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calvarial Bloom Biomechanics: Dural Tension Governing Cranial Form.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- When Virchow's law fails: Crouzon syndrome as a test case for quantitative suture closure-endocranial shape relationships.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- The influence of closed sutures on cranial morphology in Apert and Crouzon syndromes: A quantitative analysis.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Craniosynostoses are congenital conditions characterized by premature suture fusions, altering skull growth and potentially impairing neurological function. Apert and Crouzon syndromes, both linked to FGFR2 mutations, share features but differ in their patterns of suture fusion and cranial deformation. This study quantitatively analyzes, with a high-resolution 3D morphometric analysis, global cranial morphology in syndromic craniosynostoses, comparing Crouzon and Apert syndromes to controls using standard medical CT scans; 72 unoperated patients with syndromic craniosynostoses (51 with Crouzon syndrome, 21 with Apert syndrome) and 289 controls were analyzed. Cranial vault segmentation was performed, and surfaces were rigidly aligned. Non-rigid registration enabled standardized mesh generation, with semi-landmarks extracted for shape analysis. Age-related shape variation was mitigated before analysis identified key morphological variation axes. Statistical comparisons revealed significant shape differences. Apert patients displayed a distinct turricephalic vault morphology with increased cranial height and reduced width, whereas Crouzon patients were more variable, with a moderate brachycephalic shape in bicoronal fusion and reduced vault distortion in pansynostosis. Unsupervised clustering showed clear morphometric separation of Apert patients, while Crouzon patients exhibited greater heterogeneity. Subgroups within Crouzon syndrome revealed specific deformation patterns associated with suture closure configurations. These findings refine our understanding of cranial shape variations in syndromic craniosynostoses and emphasize the need for integrating advanced morphometric analyses into clinical assessments. The distinct morphological signatures identified in Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome subgroups could inform personalized surgical planning and enhance phenotypic-genotypic correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.