ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2025
Vesicouterine fistula with vesical calculi secondary to IUD migration: a case report.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From contraception to urolithiasis: Migration of a contraceptive device into the urinary bladder lumen.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Cystoscopic retrieval of a migrated IUD with bladder stone formation during pregnancy termination: a Case Report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntrauterine device (IUD) migration leading to vesicouterine fistula (VUF) with vesical calculi is rare. This case is notable due to the absence of typical Youssef’s syndrome symptoms and the insidious presentation of a Type III VUF, complicating timely diagnosis. A 31-year-old woman with a 10-year history of a migrated "T-shaped" IUD presented with lower abdominal pain. Initial hysteroscopy failed to detect the IUD, but ultrasound revealed a bladder foreign body. Computed tomography urography (CTU) and cystoscopy confirmed a VUF (1 cm diameter) and a 3 cm vesical calculus encasing the IUD. Notably, she lacked cyclic hematuria or vaginal urination but experienced transient hematuria after placement of a catheter. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Laparoscopic vesicouterine fistula resection, bladder and uterine repair, and IUD removal were performed. Vesical calculi were fragmented via holmium laser lithotripsy. Postoperative imaging at 3, 9, and 12 months confirmed fistula resolution, no calculi recurrence, and restored menstrual regularity. CONCLUSION WITH CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Type III VUF without urinary leakage poses diagnostic challenges. IUD displacement into the bladder warrants suspicion for VUF, even in asymptomatic patients. Laparoscopic repair is effective, emphasizing complete fistula excision and scar tissue removal. Annual gynecological surveillance is critical for IUD users to prevent complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.