Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624683›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2025

Resection of urethral caruncles with holmium laser vs. conventional excision: a comparative study of minimally invasive outcomes.

Shuxia Zhu, Ting Zeng, Qiang Liu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuxia ZhuDepartment of Urology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, No. 10 Qing Yun Nan, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610017, P.R. China.
Ting ZengDepartment of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.
Qiang LiuDepartment of Urology, Chengdu Second People's Hospital, No. 10 Qing Yun Nan, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610017, P.R. China. hanyuqiang202101@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of holmium laser resection versus conventional surgical excision for the treatment of urethral caruncle. The study aimed to evaluate the potential advantages of holmium laser, such as its precision and minimal invasiveness, over traditional surgical methods.

methodsA retrospective cohort study included 116 patients (50 laser vs. 66 conventional) from June 2020 to August 2023. Outcomes included operative time, complications, and recurrence.

resultsThe laser cohort demonstrated statistically significant reductions in operation duration (6.4 ± 1.2 vs. 28 ± 4.3 min, p < 0.001), catheterization time (2.1 ± 0.8 vs. 6.3 ± 1.5 days, p < 0.001), and length of hospitalization (3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 4.3 ± 1.1 days, p < 0.001) compared to the conventional surgical group. The holmium laser group had lower postoperative bleeding rates (0% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.08). One recurrence occurred in the conventional surgical group. No patient in either group developed urethral stricture during the follow-up period.

conclusionHolmium laser resection is a safe and efficient alternative for urethral caruncle, associated with reduced operative time and morbidity.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateUrethral DiseasesAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrethraHolmium laserMinimally invasive surgeryUrethral caruncle

Identifiers

PMID40624683
PMCPMC12232686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.