Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624681›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Analysis and interpretation of organizational silence behavior of male nurses from the perspective of phenomenology.

Mengjing Yan, Zhenyin Shi, Aihua Zhou, Shuqin Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengjing YanSchool of Nursing, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Zhenyin ShiSchool of Nursing, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Aihua ZhouThe First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Shuqin ZengThe First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China. 15270601788@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMale nurses play an important role in the nursing industry, but organizational silence is prevalent, leading to high turnover rates, a young and unstable workforce, and hindering the development of the nursing profession. This study aims to analyze the underlying causes of organizational silence among male nurses and provide empirical evidence for managers to stabilize the male nursing workforce and tap into their value.

methodUsing WeChat as an online communication platform, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 male nurses from four tertiary hospitals in Guangdong Province (southern China), Hunan Province (central China), Guizhou Province (southwestern China), and Jiangxi Province (southeastern China) using an interpretive phenomenological research method. The data were analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological analysis method.

resultsMale nurses' experiences of organizational silence were distilled into three themes: the influence of leadership on speaking up, low social acceptance, and subjective influence.

conclusionThis study found that organizational silence among male nurses is widespread and severe, influenced by various factors such as organizational atmosphere, policy systems, and social recognition. Nursing managers should optimize management strategies, improve communication, enhance male nurses' professional identity, and establish reasonable training pathways to enhance their professional and academic capabilities, thereby gaining social recognition, stabilizing the nursing workforce, and promoting the diversification and high-quality development of the nursing profession.

Indexed as

Male nursesOrganizational silencePhenomenologyQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40624681
PMCPMC12232786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.