ArticleBiomedical engineering online2025
Filter-type neural network-based counter-pulsation control in pulsatile ECMO: improving heartbeat-pulse discrimination and synchronization accuracy.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implementing counter-pulsation (CP) control in pulsatile extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (p-ECMO) systems offers a refined approach to mitigate risks commonly associated with conventional ECMOs. To attain CP between the p-ECMO and heart, accurate detection of heartbeats within blood pressure (BP) waveform data becomes imperative, especially in situations where measuring electrocardiograms (ECGs) are difficult or impractical. In this study, a cumulative algorithm incorporating filter-type neural networks was developed to distinguish heartbeats from other pulse signals generated by the p-ECMO, reflections, or motion artifacts in the BP data. A control system was implemented using the cumulative algorithm that detects the heart rate (HR) and maintains a proper interval between the p-ECMO's pulses and heart beats, thereby achieving CP. To ensure precise circulatory support control, the p-ECMO setup was connected to a mock circulation system, with the human BP waveforms being replicated using a heart model. The algorithm could maintain CP perfectly when the HR remained constant; however, owing to a 0.48-s delay from the HR detection to CP control, the success rate of the CP control decreases when a sudden increase in the HR occurred. In fact, when the HR varied by ± 5 bpm every minute, the CP success rate dropped to 78.62%; however, this was still higher as compared to the 25.75% success rate achieved when no control was applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.