ArticleBMC cancer2025
Evaluating cell-free DNA integrity index as a non-invasive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Cell-Free DNA Quantification and Integrity in Breast Cancer Using Fluorometric, Electrophoretic and PCR-Based Platforms.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Screening, Prognostic, and Predictive Molecular Tools for Colorectal Cancer: Recent Advances in the Classical Background.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is gaining attention as a treatment for advanced colorectal cancer owing to its potential to improve surgical outcomes and prognosis. However, reliable biomarkers to predict the response to NAC are lacking. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) integrity index for NAC response, using machine learning to compensate for the small cohort size.
methodsThis retrospective study included 31 locally advanced colorectal cancer patients who underwent NAC and surgery at the Nippon Medical School Hospital between 2016 and 2020. Blood samples were collected pre-post-NAC to assess cfDNA levels using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The cfDNA integrity index was calculated based on the ratio of long to short fragments in the long-interspersed element-1 repeat sequence. Statistical analyses, including random forest modeling, were performed to evaluate the predictive value of the cfDNA integrity index for treatment response.
resultsOf the 31 patients, 19 (61.3%) were classified as responders and 12 (38.7%) as non-responders. The post-NAC cfDNA integrity index was significantly different between the groups (P = 0.002, odds ratio = 16.0). Random forest analysis identified changes in the cfDNA integrity index as the most important predictor of NAC response (%IncMSE: 15.79; IncNodePurity: 2.21), while sex, age, tumor site, and pre-NAC cfDNA levels were not significant predictors.
conclusionsVariability in the cfDNA integrity index shows promise as a biomarker for predicting NAC efficacy in colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.