ReviewJournal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Cardiac myosin inhibitors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Mavacamten and Aficamten in Obstructive and Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical pathways in cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Multimodality Imaging in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Phenotyping to Precision Clinical Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative efficacy of pharmacological therapies in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a frequentist network meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Present and Future Options for Pharmacotherapy in Cardiovascular Disease: Hemodynamic and Mechanistic Therapeutic Targets.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of mavacamten in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- The ODYSSEY-HCM and MAPLE-HCM studies: the role of cardiac myosin inhibitors in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (obstructive and non-obstructive).European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Incidence of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death with Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Effect of mavacamten on sudden cardiac death risk scores in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Multimodality imaging in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Mavacamten for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Targeting Sarcomeric Hypercontractility with Demonstrated Long-Term Safety and Efficacy-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Case Report: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy meets left ventricular hypertrabeculation: from mixed cardiomyopathy to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with hypertrabeculation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mavacamten, the first selective and reversible cardiac myosin inhibitor (CMI), has been introduced to the clinical arena for the treatment of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). By reducing excessive actin-myosin cross-bridging, this agent decreases myocardial contractility and alleviates the dynamic left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in obstructive HCM. In the EXPLORER-HCM trial, mavacamten significantly improved exercise capacity, symptoms, and LVOT pressure gradients, while the VALOR-HCM trial proved it can obviate the need for septal reduction therapy in patients who were deemed to be candidates for septal reduction therapy. Notably, long-term data (MAVA-LTE study) has demonstrated sustained benefits up to 180 weeks, with < 10% experiencing transient reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% and only 1.3% of permanent discontinuation rate. Aficamten, a next-generation CMI with a shorter half-life, has also demonstrated comparable efficacy. Reverse remodeling following treatment was noted in both agents. In nonobstructive HCM, preliminary studies (MAVERICK-HCM trial and cohort 4 of REDWOOD-HCM trial) have reported improvements in cardiac serum biomarkers and symptoms. However, the preliminary results from phase 3 trials (ODYSSEY-HCM trial) revealed that primary endpoints were not met in nonobstructive HCM. Regarding safety, both were generally well tolerated. Although an LVEF reduction occurred in some patients, it was reversible with a dose reduction or a short-term drug cessation. These results emphasize careful dosing strategy with regular echocardiographic monitoring. Real-world data have also demonstrated consistent efficacy and safety across varying ethnic groups without new safety signals. CMI is a major advance in HCM management. However, future studies must provide data on hard clinical outcomes, such as heart failure hospitalization or death. Ongoing trials comparing CMI to traditional first-line therapies, such as β-blockers, will clarify their potential role as an initial therapeutic option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.