ArticleBMC urology2025
Evaluation of the changes in hydrogel spacer volume in patients treated with proton therapy for prostate cancer.
Article in BMC urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRectal bleeding is a recognized late complication of radiation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer, and hydrogel spacers have been used to prevent this adverse effect. Previous reports have indicated that the volume of hydrogel spacers remains stable for at least 3 months after implantation [1]; however, no cases of early resolution have been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the hydrogel spacer volume changes over time.
methodsWe included 103 patients implanted with hydrogel spacers who underwent proton therapy at our hospital between April 2020 and November 2022. Two patients were excluded due to improper hydrogel spacer placement beyond the prostatic side of Denonvilliers' fascia. To examine the volume of Space OAR, we measured the spacer volume using magnetic resonance imaging at the time of dosimetry treatment planning and again at 7 and 21 fractions in the remaining 101 patients.
resultsAmong the 101 patients, four exhibited a significant reduction in spacer volume at 21 fractions, and one of these patients experienced rectal bleeding.
conclusionUnexpected early changes in the hydrogel spacer volume may increase rectal exposure from the time of radiation planning. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.