Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624494›Full record

ReviewBMC veterinary research2025

Time to revise: impact of methodology on boar sperm capacitation in vitro via phosphotyrosine patterns.

Barbora Klusackova, Aneta Pilsova, Natalie Zelenkova, Zuzana Pilsova, Romana Krejcirova, Eva Chmelikova, Katerina Komrskova, Ondrej Simonik, Pavla Postlerova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Barbora KlusackovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Aneta PilsovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Natalie ZelenkovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zuzana PilsovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Romana KrejcirovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva ChmelikovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Katerina KomrskovaLaboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic.
Ondrej SimonikLaboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Biotechnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, BIOCEV, Vestec, Czech Republic. ondrej.simonik@ibt.cas.cz.
Pavla PostlerovaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. postlerova@af.czu.cz.

Funding

Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biotechnology RVO: 86652036Fakulta Agrobiologie, Potravinových a Přírodních Zdrojů, Česká Zemědělská Univerzita v Praze SV24-21-21230Grantová Agentura České Republiky GA22-31156SMinistry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic LUAUS25072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capacitation is a crucial sperm maturation process occurring in vivo in the female reproductive tract, enabling spermatozoa to fertilize the oocyte. In vitro, capacitation can be induced using defined capacitation media (CM), with further assessment of protein tyrosine phosphorylation (PTyr) patterns widely used as a marker to evaluate sperm capacitation. This review critically examines the factors influencing PTyr detection in boar spermatozoa variability introduced by different methodological approaches. Discrepancies in PTyr patterns may be a result of different sperm handling, including preservation methods, selection techniques, and capacitation protocols. Semen extenders, which may contain unknown components, can affect the variability in capacitation status. Selection techniques commonly employed to isolate viable spermatozoa may initiate different capacitation regulatory pathways, resulting in variability in analyzed sperm subpopulations and inconsistencies in PTyr detection. Similarly, the lack of standardization in CM composition significantly impacts capacitation outcomes. Fixation protocols further increase variability in PTyr pattern detection, as aldehydic fixatives potentially alter protein structures, while alcohol-based fixatives cause protein aggregation and plasma membrane disruption. While PTyr immunofluorescence remains a valuable tool for capacitation assessment, its reliability is limited by methodological variability. Mimicking in vivo conditions is crucial, and even minor modifications in the sperm capacitation process may provide inconsistent results in PTyr patterns across studies. This review offers valuable insights into often-disregarded methodological details and highlights the need for improved for better standardization of capacitation protocols. The uniform methodological approach improves reproducibility and reliability in capacitation studies and stimulates further investigation leading to the discovery of alternative additional markers to determine the capacitation status in mammalian spermatozoa.

Indexed as

PhosphotyrosineSpermatozoaSperm CapacitationAnimalsMalePhosphorylationSemen AnalysisSwinePhosphotyrosineCapacitation mediaImmunofluorescenceProtein phosphorylationReproductionSignaling pathwaySperm fixation

Identifiers

PMID40624494
PMCPMC12232637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.