ReviewBMC veterinary research2025
Time to revise: impact of methodology on boar sperm capacitation in vitro via phosphotyrosine patterns.
Review in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative analysis of sperm preparation techniques on DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Differential Modulation of Capacitation-Associated Responses in Boar Spermatozoa by In Vitro Capacitation Media: A Kinetic Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- In Vitro Capacitation in Boar Sperm: Evaluation of Selected Detection Techniques.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Medium Composition Determines the Dynamics of Boar In Vitro Sperm Capacitation-Associated Events.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Capacitation is a crucial sperm maturation process occurring in vivo in the female reproductive tract, enabling spermatozoa to fertilize the oocyte. In vitro, capacitation can be induced using defined capacitation media (CM), with further assessment of protein tyrosine phosphorylation (PTyr) patterns widely used as a marker to evaluate sperm capacitation. This review critically examines the factors influencing PTyr detection in boar spermatozoa variability introduced by different methodological approaches. Discrepancies in PTyr patterns may be a result of different sperm handling, including preservation methods, selection techniques, and capacitation protocols. Semen extenders, which may contain unknown components, can affect the variability in capacitation status. Selection techniques commonly employed to isolate viable spermatozoa may initiate different capacitation regulatory pathways, resulting in variability in analyzed sperm subpopulations and inconsistencies in PTyr detection. Similarly, the lack of standardization in CM composition significantly impacts capacitation outcomes. Fixation protocols further increase variability in PTyr pattern detection, as aldehydic fixatives potentially alter protein structures, while alcohol-based fixatives cause protein aggregation and plasma membrane disruption. While PTyr immunofluorescence remains a valuable tool for capacitation assessment, its reliability is limited by methodological variability. Mimicking in vivo conditions is crucial, and even minor modifications in the sperm capacitation process may provide inconsistent results in PTyr patterns across studies. This review offers valuable insights into often-disregarded methodological details and highlights the need for improved for better standardization of capacitation protocols. The uniform methodological approach improves reproducibility and reliability in capacitation studies and stimulates further investigation leading to the discovery of alternative additional markers to determine the capacitation status in mammalian spermatozoa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.