ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Explainable machine learning model for predicting the transarterial chemoembolization response and subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From black-box prediction to transparent insight: the status quo and paradigm shift of explainable artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma research.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- Gut microbiome remodeling across hepatocellular carcinoma progression and transarterial chemoembolization is associated with therapeutic response and prognosis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Construction of a Preoperative Prediction Model for TACE Resistance in Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, faces heterogeneous responses to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in intermediate-stage disease. We developed a Machine Learning (ML)-based model integrating routine clinical variables to preoperatively predict TACE efficacy, enabling tailored TACE candidate selection and optimized therapeutic decision-making.
methodsThis retrospective multicentre study enrolled treatment-naive HCC patients undergoing initial TACE from two independent cohorts: the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (training cohort) and Wenzhou Central Hospital (external validation cohort). Through recursive feature elimination (RFE), we systematically developed prediction models employing ten distinct ML algorithms. The SHAP algorithm was implemented to enhance model interpretability, while patient stratification was subsequently performed using PCA and K-means clustering to facilitate comprehensive prognostic analysis.
resultsWe retrospectively collected 382 unresectable HCC patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University and 52 from Wenzhou Central Hospital. RFE method identified 10 predictors for constructing ML models. XGBoost and CatBoost outperformed other algorithms, achieving AUCs of 0.796–0.799 (internal test) and 0.785–0.791 (external validation) with balanced accuracy (76-76.8%). SHAP interpretability revealed tumor burden and hepatic function markers as key determinants of TACE resistance. K-means clustering stratified patients into two prognostically distinct subgroups: Cluster B showed significantly longer survival than Cluster A (HR = 0.36, 95%CI:0.26–0.49, P < 0.001), confirming the clinical relevance of ML-selected features.
conclusionWe developed and validated an interpretable ML-based system integrating predictive modelling and patient clustering to individualize TACE efficacy prediction and clinical risk stratification for HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.