ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Safety profile of ramelteon from the perspective of physicians and pharmacists: a 20-year real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating and Determining the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Motor Vehicle Driving Performance: Key Considerations of the Japanese Guideline and Criteria for Clinical Implementation of Evidence.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2026Review
- Muscle toxicity reports in FAERS: a disproportionality analysis with focus on rhabdomyolysis and cross-database assessment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRamelteon is the first selective melatonin receptor agonist approved by the FDA, demonstrating significant clinical value in improving sleep latency and sleep quality in patients with insomnia. However, its long-term adverse effects have not been fully evaluated. This study analyzes adverse events associated with ramelteon based on data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
methodsCase reports submitted by physicians and pharmacists were extracted from the FAERS database from the first quarter of 2005 to the third quarter of 2024. Signal detection was performed using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) algorithms.
resultsA total of 1,150 reports related to ramelteon were analyzed, covering 26 System Organ Classes (SOC) and 537 preferred terms (PT). The main SOCs included psychiatric disorders, general disorders and administration site conditions, and nervous system disorders. Female patients reported higher instances of insomnia, while hangover, feeling drunk, and decreased blood testosterone were more commonly observed in male patients. At the PT level, hangover, initial insomnia, and glossoptosis exhibited the highest signal strengths. Sleep-related adverse events (AE), such as initial insomnia, somnolence, middle insomnia, poor quality sleep, and hypersomnia, were confirmed. Notably, we report for the first time that ramelteon is associated with parasomnia-related AEs, including sleep talking, sleep terror, screaming, and somnambulism.
conclusionOur study reveals a broad spectrum of AEs associated with ramelteon, including unique sensory experiences (e.g., hangover, derealisation, feeling drunk), reproductive system effects (e.g., decreased libido, priapism), hallucination-related AEs (e.g., visual hallucinations), and rare but clinically significant reactions (e.g., glossoptosis, restless legs syndrome, and photopsia). These findings expand the current understanding of ramelteon's safety and underscore the importance of closely monitoring patients' responses during treatment. Emphasis should be placed on individualized treatment strategies and strengthened pharmacovigilance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.