Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624448›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025

Physicochemical, microbial, and microbiome dynamics in winery waste composting.

Gregoria Mitropoulou, Ioanna Karapantzou, Ioanna Prapa, Dimitra Papanikolaou, Vasileios Charovas, Yiannis Kourkoutas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gregoria MitropoulouLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Ioanna KarapantzouLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Ioanna PrapaLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Dimitra PapanikolaouLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Vasileios CharovasEvritika Kellaria S.A, 68200, Orestiada, Greece.
Yiannis KourkoutasLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece. ikourkou@mbg.duth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2842-7666

Funding

The European Union and National Resources under the Operational Programme "Eastern Macedonia and Thrace" 2014-2020 MIS number: 5076618The European Union and National Resources under the Operational Programme "Eastern Macedonia and Thrace" 2014-2020 ΑΜΘΡ7-0074893
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to more extensively studied composting substrates like food waste or animal manure, winery waste presents unique challenges and opportunities. Its high content of lignin, cellulose, and polyphenolic compounds demands specific microbial consortia for efficient degradation and can potentially inhibit microbial activity if not properly balanced. In the present study, analysis of winery waste composting that combines traditional microbial enumeration with high-resolution microbiome profiling, an approach rarely applied to this type of agro-industrial residue, was implemented. Moreover, a practical proof-of-concept study, for using the composted product as a partial substrate replacement in grapevine cultivation, closing the loop in vineyard waste management, was conducted. Key parameters, such as moisture content, pH, temperature, conductivity, and C/N ratio were monitored, over a 60-day period, along with changes in enzymatic activity and shifts in microbial populations, indicating dynamic microbial activity. At the end of the process, a reduction in the carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio was observed, pH was stabilized to neutral values, and dehydrogenases activity was notably decreased. Microbiome analysis revealed eight bacterial and six fungal phyla. Acidobacteria, Armatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes, Candidatus Saccharibacteria, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Planctomycetes were identified. The Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Glomeromycota, and Mucoromycota fungal phyla were also detected. The compost exhibited no phytotoxicity and supported grapevine growth comparable to commercial substrates. Winery waste microbial composting led to stable biofertilizer production, evidenced by physicochemical stability, lack of phytotoxicity, and effectiveness in promoting grapevine growth suggesting the potential of composting as a sustainable waste management solution in the winemaking industry.

Indexed as

CompostingMicrobiotaWineBacteriaFungiIndustrial WasteVitisIndustrial WasteBiofertilizerCompostingMicrobiome dynamicsWinery waste

Identifiers

PMID40624448
PMCPMC12328514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.