ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025
Physicochemical, microbial, and microbiome dynamics in winery waste composting.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Substrate-Driven Microbiome Assembly in Water Hyacinth Vermicompost: Combined 16S rRNA and Shotgun Metagenomics for Sustainable Agriculture.Journal of basic microbiology · 2026Article
- Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)-Compost Amendment Increases Diversity, Functional Activities, and Network Connectivity of a Vineyard Soil Microbiota.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Diatomite-Mediated Humification and Fungal Community Succession During Composting.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Grape Stalks as a Sustainable Feed Supplement for Dairy Cows: A Preliminary In Vivo Study on Milk Microbiota and Cheese Quality.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compared to more extensively studied composting substrates like food waste or animal manure, winery waste presents unique challenges and opportunities. Its high content of lignin, cellulose, and polyphenolic compounds demands specific microbial consortia for efficient degradation and can potentially inhibit microbial activity if not properly balanced. In the present study, analysis of winery waste composting that combines traditional microbial enumeration with high-resolution microbiome profiling, an approach rarely applied to this type of agro-industrial residue, was implemented. Moreover, a practical proof-of-concept study, for using the composted product as a partial substrate replacement in grapevine cultivation, closing the loop in vineyard waste management, was conducted. Key parameters, such as moisture content, pH, temperature, conductivity, and C/N ratio were monitored, over a 60-day period, along with changes in enzymatic activity and shifts in microbial populations, indicating dynamic microbial activity. At the end of the process, a reduction in the carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio was observed, pH was stabilized to neutral values, and dehydrogenases activity was notably decreased. Microbiome analysis revealed eight bacterial and six fungal phyla. Acidobacteria, Armatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes, Candidatus Saccharibacteria, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Planctomycetes were identified. The Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Glomeromycota, and Mucoromycota fungal phyla were also detected. The compost exhibited no phytotoxicity and supported grapevine growth comparable to commercial substrates. Winery waste microbial composting led to stable biofertilizer production, evidenced by physicochemical stability, lack of phytotoxicity, and effectiveness in promoting grapevine growth suggesting the potential of composting as a sustainable waste management solution in the winemaking industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.