Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624437›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of behavioral medicine2025

Intention Setting to Improve Sleep Practices: The Impact on Sleep and Theory of Planned Behaviour Variables; a Randomised Control Trial in Undergraduate Students.

Jayne Spiller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jayne SpillerSchool of Psychology and Vision Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom. jkt12@leicester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated whether providing sleep hygiene advice combined with intention setting to improve sleep increased sleep hygiene, sleep period, and advanced bedtime compared with a wellbeing intervention.

methodThe intervention for this randomised control trial was delivered in a single online session to undergraduate students. Participants were randomised to either the sleep intervention, an intervention for mental wellbeing, or a control condition. Participants in the sleep and wellbeing conditions watched a video about healthy sleep habits and healthy mental wellbeing, respectively, and set three intentions to improve this outcome. Theory of planned behaviour variables were assessed pre- and post-intervention, and sleep variables were assessed pre-intervention and at 1-week follow-up (n = 128 included at the follow-up).

resultsSleep hygiene scores were significantly lower for the sleep intention setting group compared with the control group post-intervention, reflecting a small effect size (Cohen's d .45). Following the sleep intervention, there was no difference in sleep period or bedtime relative to the control group. Setting intentions did significantly increase participants' intention to use strategies to improve their sleep, but change in intention score was not associated with post-intervention attitude, control belief strength, or power in relation to sleep.

conclusionSetting intentions to improve sleep results in improved sleep hygiene compared to setting no intentions. However, improved sleep hygiene does not transfer to an increased sleep period or earlier bedtimes, nor does it change attitude and perceived behavioural control. Future studies should consider the moderating role of environmental barriers to intention setting.

Indexed as

Intention settingSleepSleep hygieneTheory of planned behaviourUndergraduate students

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.