ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Fairness of machine learning readmission predictions following open ventral hernia repair.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in abdominal wall hernia surgery: clinical applications and translational readiness.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Unsupervised Clinical Phenotyping Identifies Distinct Risk Profiles in Incisional Hernia Repair.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFew models have predicted readmission following open ventral hernia repair (VHR), and none have assessed fairness. Fairness evaluation assesses whether predictive performance is similar across demographic groups, ensuring that biases are not propagated. Therefore, we generated an interpretable machine learning model to predict readmission following open VHR while assessing fairness.
methodsNSQIP (2018-2021) was queried for open VHR. We developed an XGBoost model to predict unplanned readmissions within 30 days of surgery with fivefold cross-validation. Performance and fairness were assessed by demographic groups: gender (female vs. male), ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic), and race (non-White vs. White). We identified influential features within demographic groups using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
results59,482 patients were included with a readmission rate of 5.5%. The model had an AUC of 0.72 and a Brier score of 0.16. Fairness metrics revealed minimal performance differences between demographic groups. SHAP revealed that influential factors were similar across demographic groups and included days from operation to discharge, morbidity probability, and operative time.
conclusionUsing interpretable machine learning, we identified unique predictors for unplanned readmission following open VHR. Fairness metrics revealed minimal differences in performance between demographic groups. SHAP showed similar influential factors across demographic groups. Future surgical machine learning models should similarly assess models using fairness metrics and interpretation of predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.