ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
Evaluation of using small volume of interest regions for clinical kidney dosimetry in
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modelling the relative precision of whole-kidney dosimetry in molecular radiotherapy using a power law approach.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence across oncologic theranostics: evidence for patient stratification, dosimetry, and adaptive radiopharmaceutical therapy.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026Review
- Dosimetric implications of kidney anatomical volume changes inEJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Anatomy-based correction of kidney PVE on [Formula: see text] SPECT images.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Segmentation of the whole-kidney parenchyma (WKP) is considered the reference method for kidney dosimetry of radiopharmaceuticals, as it provides the average absorbed dose to the fully delineated WKP. However manual segmentation of the WKP is time consuming, and automated segmentation requires operator verification and potential manual adjustments to the VOI. The aim is to determine if a small volume of interest (SV) method can generate similar kidney absorbed doses as the WKP method.
methodsWe obtained SPECT/CT of 18 patients at 24, 48, and 168 h after injection of [
resultsThe mean RCs of the WKP volumes (31-243 mL) in non-filtered ASCC-SPECT and AC-SPECT were 0.85 (0.73-0.90) and 0.62 (0.46-0.51), respectively. In non-filtered images, the absorbed dose was overestimated by a factor of 1.22. However, applying a Gaussian filter with a kernel size of approximately 5 mm yielded absorbed dose estimates comparable to the reference WKP method. The accuracy of kidney dosimetry calculation based on one SV
conclusionThe small volume of interest (SV) method can provide absorbed dose estimates comparable to the whole-kidney parenchyma (WKP) method when optimized. Non-filtered images overestimated doses by 1.22, but applying a 5 mm Gaussian filter aligned SV results with the WKP method. Using multiple VOIs improved accuracy, with five 2 mL SVs achieving 8.3%. The SV method provides a less time-consuming alternative to WKP; however, its implementation is recommended to be validated and adjusted against a reference method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.