ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Radiographic Bone Texture Analysis using Deep Learning Models for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Diagnosis.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in rheumatoid arthritis: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for postoperative plain radiographic assessment after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current evidence, clinical readiness, and limitations.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based multiclass classification for the diagnosis of hand arthritis on digital radiography: a multicenter study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Medical imaging in rheumatoid arthritis: A review on deep learning approach.Open life sciences · 2023Article
- Molecular Imaging of Inflammatory Disease.Biomedicines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is distinguished by the presence of modified bone microarchitecture, also known as 'texture,' in the periarticular regions. The radiographic detection of such alterations in RA can be challenging. To train and to validate a deep learning model to quantitatively produce periarticular texture features directly from radiography and predict the diagnosis of early RA without human reading. Two kinds of deep learning models were compared for diagnostic performance. Anterior-posterior bilateral hands radiographs of 891 early RA (within one year of initial diagnosis) and 1237 non-RA patients were split into a training set (64%), a validation set (16%), and a test set (20%). The second, third, and fourth distal metacarpal areas were segmented for the Deep Texture Encoding Network (Deep-TEN; texture-based) and residual network-50 (ResNet-50; texture and structure-based) models to predict the probability of RA. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics curve for RA was 0.69 for the Deep-TEN model and 0.73 for the ResNet-50 model. The positive predictive values of a high texture score to classify RA using the Deep-TEN and ResNet-50 models were 0.64 and 0.67, respectively. High mean texture scores were associated with age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for RA of 3.42 (2.59-4.50) and 4.30 (3.26-5.69) using the Deep-TEN and ResNet-50 models, respectively. The moderate and high RA risk groups determined by the Deep-TEN model were associated with adjusted ORs (95% CIs) of 2.48 (1.78-3.47) and 4.39 (3.11-6.20) for RA, respectively, and those using the ResNet-50 model were 2.17 (1.55-3.04) and 6.91 (4.83-9.90), respectively. Fully automated quantitative assessment for periarticular texture by deep learning models can help in the classification of early RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.