ArticleHeart and vessels2025
Comparison between contrast-guided and pressure-guided ablation using the novel pressure visualization tool for cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During cryoballon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) complete occlusion of the pulmonary vein ostia during the freeze cycles is mandatory. Typically, PV occlusion is assessed by contrast injection under fluoroscopy. Using an update for the Cryo Console it is possible to directly visualize occlusion pressure as an indicator of complete PV occlusion during cryoballoon procedures. In this study, we compared PV pressure monitoring during cryoballoon PVI to a conventional approach regarding procedural outcomes. We retrospectively analysed the procedural data of 50 patients (25 patients with pressure-guided PVI and 25 patients with contrast-guided PVI) treated with cryoballoon PVI in our centre. Complete PV occlusion in the pressure-guided group was defined as an abrupt change in the pressure waveform with a loss of the a-wave after advancing the cryoballoon to the PV ostium. We observed comparable results regarding procedural time, left atrial dwell time or fluoroscopy time when comparing the pressure guided to our conventional approach. Moreover, there were no differences regarding acute procedural effectivity or freeze cycle characteristics. As expected, a significant reduction of contrast use was achieved in the pressure measurement group (10.4 vs. 25.5 ml, p < 0.0001). Monitoring complete PV occlusion by visualizing the occlusion pressure is feasible. Acute procedural outcome was comparable to our standard approach using contrast injection to verify complete PV occlusion. Most importantly, a significant reduction in contrast use could be achieved which has to be confirmed in larger patient cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.