ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
Holographic transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation enhances stimulation efficacy by cooperatively recruiting distributed brain circuits.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional aperture-driven photoacoustic tomography (3D-ADPAT).Science advances · 2026Article
- Bayesian-enhanced closed-loop optimization of ultrasound protocols for targeted and precise neuromodulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation in Psychiatric Disorders: Mechanisms, Models, and Missing Links.Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
- Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation as an Emerging Treatment for Substance use Disorder: Promise and Precaution.Current addiction reports · 2026Review
- Flexible ultrasound array for subcortical brain stimulation in humans: a simulation study.NPJ acoustics · 2026Article
- Decoding paradoxical BOLD responses to transcranial ultrasound stimulation with concurrent optoacoustic magnetic resonance imaging.Science advances · 2025Article
- Brain-wide hemodynamic responses to precise transcranial ultrasound neuromodulation.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precision-targeted ultrasonic neuromodulation offers immense potential for studying brain function and treating neurological diseases. Yet, its application has been limited by challenges in achieving precise spatio-temporal control and monitoring of ultrasound effects on brain circuits. Here we show that transcranial ultrasound elicits direct and highly focal responses, which can be dynamically steered at spatio-temporal scales relevant for neural function. Furthermore, holographic transcranial ultrasound stimulation allows direct control of the stimulated volume and actively modulates local and mid-range network projections, effectively lowering the activation threshold by an order of magnitude. To better understand this previously unexplored excitability regime not fully explained by the conventional pressure-frequency dyad, we developed a dual modelling framework, where both an empirical and a mechanistic model were constructed to capture the intricacies of holographic transcranial ultrasound stimulation. These models achieve qualitative agreement with our experimental results, suggesting that these findings are predominantly driven by putative network interactions. Our results bring insight on the complex interaction mechanisms of ultrasound with neural tissue and highlight its potential for the noninvasive interfacing of distributed brain networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.