ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Understanding Curability and Life Expectancy in Surgical Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Factors that Affect Views on Cancer Prognosis.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experiences and Decisional Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery for Peritoneal Surface Malignancy: The DECISIVE Study.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExpectations about disease prognosis are challenging and understudied in patients with advanced cancers. We evaluateed patient factors associated with prognostic understanding in this population.
methodsIn this explanatory sequential mixed methods study, surveys were administered to patients with advanced-stage cancer who were seen in the surgical oncology clinic (2022-2024); a subset of patients underwent semistructured interviews. Perceived disease curability and life expectancy were compared between the patient and surgeon: the patient's prognostic rating equal to or less optimistic than their surgeon's was categorized as "concordant," whereas a higher rating was "discordant" and reflected an optimistic outlook.
resultsIn total, 165 surveys were completed. Median age was 58 years. The most common primary malignancies were appendiceal, colorectal, and gynecologic. Median time since cancer diagnosis was 18 months. Overall, 32% of patients demonstrated concordant views on curability, whereas 60% were concordant on life expectancy. Patients who had children younger than 18 years were more optimistic about disease curability and more discordant with their surgeon (84% vs. 62% discordant, p = 0.007). Additionally, patients who had lived beyond 1 year since cancer diagnosis were more optimistic about life expectancy (47% vs. 27% discordant, p = 0.012). Qualitative analysis revealed that the responsibility to nurture their children; hope of living long-term with cancer; and perspective to live in the moment were reasons to maintain an optimistic outlook.
conclusionsOur study illustrates the discordance between patient-surgeon views on curability and life expectancy in advanced cancer, while highlighting the importance of understanding patient factors that may influence their outlook on cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40624311What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.