Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624287›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2026

Dietary supplement use in longevity: evidence from 2,877 centenarians.

Jozo Grgic, Ajla Hodzic Kuerec, Brad J Schoenfeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Nutrition and longevity - diet in centenarians.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jozo GrgicNUS Academy for Healthy Longevity, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. jozo.grgic@vu.edu.au.
Ajla Hodzic KuerecNUS Academy for Healthy Longevity, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Brad J SchoenfeldDepartment of Exercise Science and Recreation, Applied Muscle Development Lab, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Centenarians represent a population achieving extreme longevity. Despite growing interest in the role of dietary supplements in aging, there is limited research examining their use among centenarians. This study assessed the prevalence, duration, and frequency of dietary supplement use among centenarians in China. Data on self-reported supplement usage were sourced from the 2018 wave of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. The analysis included 2,169 female and 708 male centenarians. Descriptive statistics were used to report prevalence, duration, and frequency of use, stratified by sex. Overall, 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.4%, 12.0%) of females and 12.3% (95% CI = 9.9%, 14.7%) of males reported using dietary supplements. The prevalence of calcium, protein, multivitamin, vitamin A/D, iron, zinc, and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) use was between 6.5-7.3%, 3.7-5.8%, 2.8-3.0%, 1.9-2.1%, 1.2-1.4%, 1.2-1.3%, 0.4-0.7%, respectively. The frequency of use was typically reported as "often". The median duration of supplement use was from 2 to 10 years. Most supplement users (7.3-8.8%) consumed a single supplement. Approximately one in ten centenarians in China reported using dietary supplements. The most commonly consumed supplements were calcium, protein, and multivitamins, while DHA was the least commonly used. Participants who reported using supplements generally indicated regular consumption. The overall pattern of dietary supplement use was similar between females and males. Given the low overall prevalence of supplement use, this lifestyle practice appears to play a relatively minor role in the lives of centenarians in China.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsLongevityAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleVitaminsVitaminsAgeingCLHLSNational cohortQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID40624287
PMCPMC12972174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.