ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025
Machine Learning Identifies Sexual Behavior Subgroups Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Switzerland.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sexual behavior is heterogeneous and dynamic. Characterization of such complexity constitutes evidence for public health authorities and caregivers concerned with the framing of sexual health messages aimed at specific subgroups. We developed a machine-learning-based methodology for inference and characterization of such subgroups from longitudinal data on men who have sex with men (MSM) attending individual sexual health counseling sessions. Because longitudinal data take time to record, we assessed the ability of first visit data to predict subgroups' membership. Our methodology comprised two main steps: (1) Hierarchical clustering to group 2349 HIV-negative MSM based on their self-reported longitudinal sexual behavior during visits to Swiss sexual health counseling centers between November 2016 and April 2019; and (2) Random forest-based classification to predict subgroup membership from first visit data. We found six subgroups with significant differences in behavioral trends, most of which sharply deviated from the overall trends. Two subgroups, which contained 37% of the study population, accounted for over 70% of the overall increases in condomless anal intercourse with non-steady partners, group sex, and having more than five anal intercourse partners. Subgroup-specific trends in online-dating and group sex were heterogeneous with opposing trends across subgroups. Data from first visits predicted trends of sexual behavior with accuracy ranging from 64 to 86%. This study evidenced specific sexual behavioral subgroups that might benefit from customized sexual health messages, demonstrated that first visit registries could predict subgroups, and contributes an algorithmic alternative for establishing subgroups relevant to inform customized sexual health messages that capture sexual behavioral diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.