ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning-based video analysis for automatically detecting penetration and aspiration in videofluoroscopic swallowing study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based screening tool for predicting the risk of oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with ischemic stroke.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Multi-Center Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Video Analysis Platform for Automatic Evaluation of Swallowing Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) is the gold standard for diagnosing dysphagia, but its interpretation is time-consuming and requires expertise. This study developed a deep learning model for automatically detecting penetration and aspiration in VFSS and assessed its diagnostic accuracy. Images corresponding to the highest and lowest positions of the hyoid bone -representing the moment of upper esophageal sphincter opening during swallow and the pre-swallow and post-swallow phases, respectively- were automatically extracted from VFSS videos, resulting in a total of 18,145 images from 1,467 patients. The model was trained with a convolutional neural network architecture, incorporating techniques to address class imbalance and optimize performance. The model achieved high diagnostic accuracy at the patient level, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.935 (normal swallowing), 0.889 (penetration), and 0.845 (aspiration). However, despite strong performance in identifying normal swallowing, the model exhibited low sensitivity for detecting penetration and aspiration. The findings suggest that the proposed model may reduce interpretation time by minimizing the need for repeated video review to identify penetration or aspiration, enabling clinicians to focus on other clinically relevant VFSS findings. Future studies should address its limitations by analyzing full-frame VFSS data and incorporating multicenter datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.