ArticleScientific reports2025
Improvement of medical images with multi-objective genetic algorithm and adaptive morphological transformations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Sinograms via Budget-Constrained PSO-Nelder-Mead: A Vision Transformer Assessment.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dermoscopically informed deep learning model for classification of actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Different variables can contribute to the corruption of medical images, causing them to appear blurred or weakened. Therefore, various researches have been done to improve them. This paper utilizes top-hat and bottom-hat morphological transformations with variable-sized disk structuring elements in opening and closing operations, in contrast to previous research that predominantly employed fixed-size disk structuring elements. Additionally, variable coefficients for these transformations are incorporated into the improved image formula, unlike previous studies that utilized constant coefficients. These proposed modifications enable the algorithm to achieve the best possible image enhancement for each individual image. The optimal values for the size of four disks used in transformations and two coefficients are obtained by using genetic algorithm with multi-objective fitting function. Both visual inspection and analysis using metrics like Entropy, SSIM, NIQE, BRISQE, AMBE, and PSNR demonstrate the presented method's success in enhancing medical images. This improvement is achieved by preserving information, suppressing noise amplification, and preventing significant brightness increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.