ArticleScientific reports2025
ResSAXU-Net for multimodal brain tumor segmentation from brain MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accurate Segmentation and Three-dimensional Reconstruction Algorithm of Spinal Cord Injury Lesions Based on Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioma, the most common brain tumour, carries the highest risk of death. Successful treatment planning and the accurate diagnosis of glioma depend heavily on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Classification of brain tumours from MR data should be automated for rigorous pathologic diagnosis and ongoing monitoring. Because of glioma's aggressive potential and diverse characteristics, standardised and accurate classification methods classifying tumours within the bladder are essential. Recent studies of U-Net separation of brain tumours have revealed challenges related to inadequate down-sampling feature extraction and loss of information from up-sampling. It is important to address these problems to enhance the accuracy of U-Net in classifying brain tumours. Deep residual network and squeeze-excitation network U-Net model. The enhanced version of Ressaxu-Net presented in this work has two new features: Ressaxu-Net improves feature information extraction and solves brain tumour classification problems by using deep residual networks to reduce network damage. By reducing information loss, the squeeze-excitation network enables the network to prioritise the most essential feature maps. This method improves the classification accuracy of small brain tumours, thereby solving problems associated with poor performance. Combining dice loss and cross-entropy loss, the fusion loss function is introduced to deal with issues such as network convergence and data imbalance, and then Ressaxu-Net performance was simulated using the Brats2018 and Brats2019 datasets study, examining how the model performs in brain tumour classification. According to the experimental results, Ressaxu-Net obtained dice similarity coefficients of 0.9597,0.9618 and 0.9595 for the total tumour, intratumoral, and elevated tumours, respectively, and 8.10%, 15.88%, and 17.33% showed improvement. This suggests that Ressaxu-Net is competitively effective in accurately classifying multiple brain tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.