Trial reportScientific reports2025
The new serratus anterior plane block is more effective than the SPB block for early postoperative analgesia following modified radical mastectomy surgery.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Serratus anterior plane block (SPB) as a regional anesthesia technique is used for analgesia in modified radical mastectomy (MRM). The new serratus anterior plane (SAP) block is a novel approach that has been described recently. This study aimed to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of SAP block for pain management after MRM and compare the analgesic effects of SPB and SAP block with those of a control group during the postoperative period of MRM. In a prospective randomized controlled trial, sixty patients (n = 60) who underwent MRM surgery received either SPB or SAP block analgesia. The primary endpoint was the visual analog scale (VAS) score (at rest or with movement) at 2 h after MRM. The secondary outcomes were VAS scores at different time points (6, 12, 24 h) after MRM, stress hormone levels, and the consumption of opioid analgesics during the surgery. Sixty subjects were enrolled. The VAS scores with movement at 2 h postoperation were significantly lower in the SAP group than in the SPB group (P = 0.027). The patients in the SAP and SPB groups had lower VAS scores compared with the Control group at 2 and 6 h after MRM, both at rest and with movement (P < 0.001). The SPB and SAP blocks significantly reduced the consumption of opioid analgesics during surgery compared with the control group (P < 0.001). This study revealed that both SPB and SAP blocks had good postoperative analgesic effects on modified radical mastectomy surgery, reduced the consumption of opioids, and decreased the stress response during surgery compared with the control group. Compared with SPB, the SAP block may have better analgesic effects during the early postoperative period of modified radical mastectomy surgery.Trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Date of Registration: 08/08/2021, registration number: ChiCTR2100049692).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.