Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40624130›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2025

Chemistry advances driving industrial carbon capture technologies.

Jeannie Z Y Tan, Joao M Uratani, Steve Griffiths, John M Andresen, M Mercedes Maroto-Valer

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Benchmarking COACS central science · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeannie Z Y TanResearch Center of Carbon Solutions (RCCS), Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3883-7194
Joao M UrataniScience Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3579-7297
Steve GriffithsAmerican University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. swgriffi@alum.mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9593-4724
John M AndresenResearch Center of Carbon Solutions (RCCS), Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.
M Mercedes Maroto-ValerResearch Center of Carbon Solutions (RCCS), Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK. m.maroto-valer@hw.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1643-2863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon capture (CC) is a key solution for decarbonizing industries with 'hard-to-abate' emissions, such as the cement, steel and chemicals sectors. The chemistry behind CC technologies underpins much of their cost and performance and hence, is an important research topic. As such, this Review focuses on the underlaying chemistry and industrial deployment status of CC technologies that have progressed to the early stages of development and beyond. The discussion provides insights into the CC technologies, which based on absorption, adsorption, membrane separation, cryogenic gas separation and electroswing, poised to have the greatest impact on industrial decarbonization.

Identifiers

PMID40624130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.